Lots of the servers are located outside the United States. The Internet is a free media and an ultimate celebration of the free world. But the world isn't a free world as yet and the organizations controlling this free media are largely under US control. Totalitarian regimes don't like the idea of western influences thrust upon them. According to Jon Christian Ryter of Washington Times, "They want the ability to create to create impenetrable cyberwalls around their countries to prevent western demagogues from brainwashing their "subjects" with inflammatory, indoctrinational ideological propaganda that will incite them against their masters.
For the past decade the UN has been bombarded by complaints from every totalitarian regime in the world that wanted to place cyberborders along the information superhighway -roadblocks to communications with the free world.
The Internet's ''root servers," a critical network of computers that makes everything else work is a US creation too.
America invented and built the root server system, and still manages it. But now the whole world depends on it, and wants a say in how it's run. A decade ago the Internet just didn't matter and nobody was bothered about who was controlling it. Times have changed and now Internet is a vital means of communication and everybody wants control of it.
If US relinquishes control there is only one possible scenario. Naseem Javed, a reknowned authority on cyberbrading and domain issues, says "Why should the Internet break and how ridiculous is this issue? Imagine if a few printers around the globe got together and jointly decided to replace all our current currencies and their value and choose brand new colors, designs and new values all own their own. What economy? It's a part of the global economy today.
Internet is a crucial means of communication in our lives. Any breakdown and there definitely will be no winners. Losers we all will be if the issue of control isn't sorted out soon. The Internet belongs to all of us and should remain free from control the way it is.
Whether the UN or anybody else, the issue here isn't of US dominance, the issue is of us, the users, who own a part of the Internet. This site uses cookies to deliver website functionality and analytics. If you would like to know more about the types of cookies we serve and how to change your cookie settings, please read our Cookie Notice.
By clicking the "I accept" button, you consent to the use of these cookies. Who owns the Internet? The answer is no one and everyone. The Internet is a network of networks. Each of the separate networks belongs to different companies and organizations, and they rely on physical servers in different countries with varying laws and regulations.
But without some common rules and norms, these networks cannot be linked effectively. Fragmentation — meaning the end of the Internet — is a real threat.
But further expansion is not guaranteed. The movement toward sovereign control of the Internet is growing, and a degree of fragmentation already exists. Many governments censor services that they think threaten their political control. While the world could muddle along this path, a great deal will be lost and many will be left behind.
For example, laws against online piracy or illegal content. Some countries also utilize censorship to block certain parts of the internet from their constituents. This has given rise to concerns about free speech and freedom of information and how an authoritarian regime could withdraw information and communicative capabilities from its citizens. Another interesting point of control over the internet is the transfer of data through infrastructure owned by different groups.
It would be possible for certain large ISPs to disallow data transfers or charge for the service along their routes. Instead, the larger ISPs enter into peering agreements that allow users of each other's networks to use their network at no cost.
There are also important groups of individuals and organizations that aim to define and promote standards for the internet. WC3 publishes standards for web developmen t that aim to ensure that web accessibility, internet infrastructure, and data management are standardized across the industry.
Another organization in this field includes ICANN The Internat Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers , which coordinates and maintains several key databases, ensuring that the internet remains stable, secure, and operational. Each of these organizations plays a role in regulating the internet in the form of developing standards, directly overseeing crucial roles, or maintaining databases that are central to the internet's continued operation.
The concept of net neutrality comes in here, which is the idea that ISPs should treat all data the same. Net neutrality has advocates and critics, and various legal battles are still ongoing worldwide.
Advocates argue that smaller content providers could be eliminated entirely without net neutrality, leading to massive monopolies over internet content.
Many countries operate antitrust authorities set up to ensure that no single internet provider can monopolize the market. But, many tech experts argue that the massive tech companies Google, Amazon, Facebook, etc. Data ownership, or intellectual property ownership, has given rise to massive debates in the last few years.
The controversy surrounding large tech company's habit of collecting swathes of information about individuals has prompted the question of who actually owns that data. For example, information about your habits online will be collected by websites like Facebook. This data can then be sold to third-party organizations to advertise more effectively.
When asking who owns the internet, it is also important to ask who owns the data produced by the internet since this is a major source of monetization, information, and potentially control of the internet. But, the person who owns the data-producing platform like Facebook probably owns the data, legally speaking.
0コメント